DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Lincoln Mark vs 2000 Ford Mustang Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Mustang

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

77.75–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

LincolnMakeFord
MarkModelMustang
1999Model year2000
CoupeBody typeCoupe
5Seats2+2
2Doors2

Performance

—0–100 km/h5,5 s
0 km/hTop speed240 km/h
4601 ccEngine displacement4601 cc
290 HPPower320 HP
400 NmTorque430 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank59 lt
—Urban consumption18 lt
—Extra-urban consumption10 lt
11,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
225/60 R16 VTyre size245/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5265 mmLength4661 mm
1900 mmWidth1857 mm
1361 mmHeight1359 mm
1715 KgWeight1525 Kg
2870 mmWheelbase2573 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Lincoln Mark and 2000 Ford Mustang approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Mustang leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…