DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Ford Mustang vs 1999 Lincoln Mark Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Mustang

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

78.75–77.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeLincoln
MustangModelMark
2000Model year1999
CoupeBody typeCoupe
2+2Seats5
2Doors2

Performance

5,5 s0–100 km/h—
240 km/hTop speed0 km/h
4601 ccEngine displacement4601 cc
320 HPPower290 HP
430 NmTorque400 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
59 ltFuel tank68 lt
18 ltUrban consumption—
10 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption11,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
245/45 R17Tyre size225/60 R16 V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4661 mmLength5265 mm
1857 mmWidth1900 mm
1359 mmHeight1361 mm
1525 KgWeight1715 Kg
2573 mmWheelbase2870 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Ford Mustang and 1999 Lincoln Mark approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Mustang leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…