DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Lincoln Mark vs 1999 AC Aceca Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

AC Aceca

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

80.75–81.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

LincolnMakeAC
MarkModelAceca
1999Model year1999
CoupeBody typeCoupe
4Seats4
2Doors3

Performance

—0–100 km/h6,1 s
220 km/hTop speed250 km/h
4601 ccEngine displacement4601 cc
284 HPPower326 HP
386 NmTorque427 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption15,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption10,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
255/60 R16 VTyre size255/55 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5255 mmLength4660 mm
1895 mmWidth1890 mm
1360 mmHeight1340 mm
1400 KgWeight1615 Kg
2870 mmWheelbase2720 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Lincoln Mark and 1999 AC Aceca approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, AC Aceca leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…