DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Lincoln Mark LT vs 2006 Holden Commodore Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lincoln Mark LT

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

82.5–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

LincolnMakeHolden
Mark LTModelCommodore
2004Model year2006
Pick-upBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

170 km/hTop speed0 km/h
5403 ccEngine displacement5665 cc
304 HPPower320 HP
481 NmTorque464 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
114 ltFuel tank75 lt
—Urban consumption13 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears6
265/60 R18Tyre size235/40 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5685 mmLength4891 mm
2004 mmWidth1842 mm
1867 mmHeight1425 mm
2645 KgWeight1615 Kg
3518 mmWheelbase2788 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Lincoln Mark LT and 2006 Holden Commodore approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lincoln Mark LT leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…