DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Cadillac Escalade vs 2004 Lincoln Mark LT Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lincoln Mark LT

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

81.5–82.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CadillacMakeLincoln
EscaladeModelMark LT
2004Model year2004
EstateBody typePick-up
8Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

8,0 s0–100 km/h—
177 km/hTop speed170 km/h
5328 ccEngine displacement5403 cc
299 HPPower304 HP
440 NmTorque481 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
98 ltFuel tank114 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears4
265/70 R17Tyre size265/60 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5052 mmLength5685 mm
2004 mmWidth2004 mm
1885 mmHeight1867 mm
2519 KgWeight2645 Kg
2946 mmWheelbase3518 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Cadillac Escalade and 2004 Lincoln Mark LT approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lincoln Mark LT leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…