DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Lincoln LS vs 2000 Jaguar XJ Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lincoln LS

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

81.75–80.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Lincoln LSSpecificationJaguar XJ
LincolnMakeJaguar
LSModelXJ
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Lincoln LSSpecificationJaguar XJ
—0–100 km/h7,3 s
220 km/hTop speed240 km/h
3950 ccEngine displacement3996 cc
256 HPPower284 HP
354 NmTorque375 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

Lincoln LSSpecificationJaguar XJ
PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank81 lt
16 ltUrban consumption17,2 lt
9 ltExtra-urban consumption8,9 lt
—Average consumption12 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Lincoln LSSpecificationJaguar XJ
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
215/60 R15Tyre size235/50 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Lincoln LSSpecificationJaguar XJ
4925 mmLength5023 mm
1860 mmWidth1799 mm
1450 mmHeight1345 mm
—Weight1780 Kg
2910 mmWheelbase2870 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Lincoln LS and 2000 Jaguar XJ approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lincoln LS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…