DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 Lincoln LS vs 1997 Jaguar XJ Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lincoln LS

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

75.75–74.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Lincoln LSSpecificationJaguar XJ
LincolnMakeJaguar
LSModelXJ
1998Model year1997
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Lincoln LSSpecificationJaguar XJ
—0–100 km/h8,2 s
210 km/hTop speed232 km/h
3950 ccEngine displacement3980 cc
245 HPPower241 HP
360 NmTorque375 Nm
8Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Lincoln LSSpecificationJaguar XJ
PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank86 lt
13 ltUrban consumption—
9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption11 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Lincoln LSSpecificationJaguar XJ
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
215/60 R16Tyre size225/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Lincoln LSSpecificationJaguar XJ
4925 mmLength5023 mm
1860 mmWidth1798 mm
1425 mmHeight1314 mm
1710 KgWeight1800 Kg
2908 mmWheelbase2870 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 Lincoln LS and 1997 Jaguar XJ approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lincoln LS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…