DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1997 Jaguar XJ vs 1998 Lincoln LS Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lincoln LS

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

74.75–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Jaguar XJSpecificationLincoln LS
JaguarMakeLincoln
XJModelLS
1997Model year1998
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Jaguar XJSpecificationLincoln LS
8,2 s0–100 km/h—
232 km/hTop speed210 km/h
3980 ccEngine displacement3950 cc
241 HPPower245 HP
375 NmTorque360 Nm
6Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

Jaguar XJSpecificationLincoln LS
PetrolFuel typePetrol
86 ltFuel tank68 lt
—Urban consumption13 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9 lt
11 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Jaguar XJSpecificationLincoln LS
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
225/60 R16Tyre size215/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Jaguar XJSpecificationLincoln LS
5023 mmLength4925 mm
1798 mmWidth1860 mm
1314 mmHeight1425 mm
1800 KgWeight1710 Kg
2870 mmWheelbase2908 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1997 Jaguar XJ and 1998 Lincoln LS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lincoln LS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…