DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Lincoln LS vs 2002 Land Rover Range Rover Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lincoln LS

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

68.5–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

LincolnMakeLand Rover
LSModelRange Rover
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

8,0 s0–100 km/h13,6 s
219 km/hTop speed179 km/h
2967 ccEngine displacement2926 cc
213 HPPower177 HP
278 NmTorque390 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
68 ltFuel tank100 lt
13,1 ltUrban consumption14,4 lt
9,4 ltExtra-urban consumption9,4 lt
—Average consumption11,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
235/50 R17Tyre size255/55 R19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4925 mmLength4950 mm
1869 mmWidth1955 mm
1425 mmHeight1860 mm
1670 KgWeight2500 Kg
2908 mmWheelbase2880 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Lincoln LS and 2002 Land Rover Range Rover approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lincoln LS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…