DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Lincoln LS vs 2004 Jaguar X-type Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lincoln LS

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

74.5–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

LincolnMakeJaguar
LSModelX-type
2004Model year2004
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h7,0 s
210 km/hTop speed235 km/h
2967 ccEngine displacement2968 cc
235 HPPower231 HP
298 NmTorque279 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank61 lt
14 ltUrban consumption14,8 lt
8 ltExtra-urban consumption7,7 lt
—Average consumption10,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
225/55 R16Tyre size225/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4925 mmLength4672 mm
1860 mmWidth1789 mm
1450 mmHeight1430 mm
1670 KgWeight1570 Kg
2910 mmWheelbase2710 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Lincoln LS and 2004 Jaguar X-type approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lincoln LS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…