DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Jaguar XJ vs 2004 Lincoln LS Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lincoln LS

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

73.5–74.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Jaguar XJSpecificationLincoln LS
JaguarMakeLincoln
XJModelLS
2004Model year2004
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Jaguar XJSpecificationLincoln LS
8,1 s0–100 km/h—
233 km/hTop speed210 km/h
2967 ccEngine displacement2967 cc
238 HPPower235 HP
293 NmTorque298 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Jaguar XJSpecificationLincoln LS
PetrolFuel typePetrol
85 ltFuel tank68 lt
15,3 ltUrban consumption14 lt
7,7 ltExtra-urban consumption8 lt
10,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Jaguar XJSpecificationLincoln LS
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears5
235/45 R17Tyre size225/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Jaguar XJSpecificationLincoln LS
5090 mmLength4925 mm
1860 mmWidth1860 mm
1448 mmHeight1450 mm
1545 KgWeight1670 Kg
3034 mmWheelbase2910 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Jaguar XJ and 2004 Lincoln LS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lincoln LS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…