2002 • Lincoln
Continental
Lincoln Continental 4.6 V8 32V (279 Hp) 2002Overall Score81.75/100
2002 Lincoln Continental vs 2003 Volkswagen Phaeton Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Volkswagen
Phaeton
Volkswagen Phaeton 4.9 V10 TDI (313 Hp) 2003Overall Score82.5/100
WINNER
Volkswagen Phaeton
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
81.75–82.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Lincoln ContinentalSpecificationVolkswagen Phaeton
LincolnMakeVolkswagen
ContinentalModelPhaeton
2002Model year2003
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Lincoln ContinentalSpecificationVolkswagen Phaeton
—0–100 km/h6,9 s
215 km/hTop speed250 km/h
4601 ccEngine displacement4921 cc
279 HPPower313 HP
373 NmTorque750 Nm
8Cylinders10
Fuel & Consumption
Lincoln ContinentalSpecificationVolkswagen Phaeton
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
76 ltFuel tank90 lt
13,8 ltUrban consumption16,5 lt
9,8 ltExtra-urban consumption8,5 lt
—Average consumption11,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Lincoln ContinentalSpecificationVolkswagen Phaeton
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears6
225/60 R16Tyre size235/50 R18 Y
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Lincoln ContinentalSpecificationVolkswagen Phaeton
5260 mmLength5055 mm
1870 mmWidth1903 mm
1420 mmHeight1450 mm
1745 KgWeight2462 Kg
2770 mmWheelbase2881 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Lincoln Continental and 2003 Volkswagen Phaeton approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volkswagen Phaeton leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
Image unavailableVSCadillac DE Ville vs Lincoln Continental2002 and 2002 model yearsImage unavailableVSLexus LS vs Lincoln Continental2002 and 2002 model yearsImage unavailableVSLexus SC vs Lincoln Continental2002 and 2002 model yearsImage unavailableVSMitsubishi Proudia/dignity vs Lincoln Continental2001 and 2002 model yearsImage unavailableVSMG ZT vs Lincoln Continental2003 and 2002 model years
Cadillac DE Ville vs Lincoln Continental2002 and 2002 model yearsImage unavailableVSLexus LS vs Lincoln Continental2002 and 2002 model yearsImage unavailableVSLexus SC vs Lincoln Continental2002 and 2002 model yearsImage unavailableVSMitsubishi Proudia/dignity vs Lincoln Continental2001 and 2002 model yearsImage unavailableVSMG ZT vs Lincoln Continental2003 and 2002 model yearsComments are loading…