2003 • MG
ZT
MG ZT 4.6 i V8 32V (260 Hp) 2003Overall Score82.5/100
2003 MG ZT vs 2002 Lincoln Continental Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Lincoln
Continental
Lincoln Continental 4.6 V8 32V (279 Hp) 2002Overall Score81.75/100
WINNER
MG ZT
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
82.5–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
MG ZTSpecificationLincoln Continental
MGMakeLincoln
ZTModelContinental
2003Model year2002
SedanBody typeSedan
4Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
MG ZTSpecificationLincoln Continental
6,5 s0–100 km/h—
250 km/hTop speed215 km/h
4601 ccEngine displacement4601 cc
260 HPPower279 HP
410 NmTorque373 Nm
8Cylinders8
Fuel & Consumption
MG ZTSpecificationLincoln Continental
PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank76 lt
17,9 ltUrban consumption13,8 lt
10,4 ltExtra-urban consumption9,8 lt
13,2 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
MG ZTSpecificationLincoln Continental
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
245/40 R18; 275/35 R18Tyre size225/60 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
MG ZTSpecificationLincoln Continental
4740 mmLength5260 mm
1780 mmWidth1870 mm
1430 mmHeight1420 mm
1595 KgWeight1745 Kg
2750 mmWheelbase2770 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 MG ZT and 2002 Lincoln Continental approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, MG ZT leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
Image unavailableVSImage unavailableCadillac DE Ville vs MG ZT2003 and 2003 model yearsVSImage unavailableLincoln Continental vs MG ZT2002 and 2003 model yearsImage unavailableVSImage unavailableToyota 4runner vs MG ZT2005 and 2003 model years
VSImage unavailableBuick Lucerne vs MG ZT2005 and 2003 model years
VSImage unavailableJeep Grand Cherokee vs MG ZT2005 and 2003 model years
VSImage unavailableLincoln Continental vs MG ZT2002 and 2003 model yearsImage unavailableVSImage unavailableToyota 4runner vs MG ZT2005 and 2003 model yearsVSImage unavailableBuick Lucerne vs MG ZT2005 and 2003 model yearsVSImage unavailableJeep Grand Cherokee vs MG ZT2005 and 2003 model yearsComments are loading…