DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Lincoln Continental vs 2014 Lincoln MKS Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lincoln MKS

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

80.75–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

LincolnMakeLincoln
ContinentalModelMKS
2016Model year2014
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3726 ccEngine displacement3496 cc
305 HPPower365 HP
380 NmTorque475 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank72 lt
13,8 ltUrban consumption13,8 lt
9 ltExtra-urban consumption9,4 lt
11,8 ltAverage consumption11,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6 SelectShift
235/50 R18Tyre size245/45 R20V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5116 mmLength5222 mm
1913 mmWidth2017 mm
1486 mmHeight1565 mm
1916 KgWeight2012 Kg
2995 mmWheelbase2868 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Lincoln Continental and 2014 Lincoln MKS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lincoln MKS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…