2014 • Ford
Flex
Ford Flex 3.5 V6 (364 Hp) 2014Overall Score81.75/100
2014 Ford Flex vs 2016 Lincoln Continental Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Lincoln
Continental
Lincoln Continental 3.7 V6 (305 Hp) 2016Overall Score80.75/100
WINNER
Ford Flex
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
81.75–80.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford FlexSpecificationLincoln Continental
FordMakeLincoln
FlexModelContinental
2014Model year2016
SUVBody typeSedan
6-7Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Ford FlexSpecificationLincoln Continental
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3496 ccEngine displacement3726 cc
364 HPPower305 HP
475 NmTorque380 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Ford FlexSpecificationLincoln Continental
PetrolFuel typePetrol
71 ltFuel tank68 lt
14,7 ltUrban consumption13,8 lt
10,2 ltExtra-urban consumption9 lt
13,1 ltAverage consumption11,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford FlexSpecificationLincoln Continental
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
235/60 R17Tyre size235/50 R18
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford FlexSpecificationLincoln Continental
5130 mmLength5116 mm
1930 mmWidth1913 mm
1727 mmHeight1486 mm
—Weight1916 Kg
2995 mmWheelbase2995 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2014 Ford Flex and 2016 Lincoln Continental approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Flex leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…