DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Lexus SC vs 1999 Mitsubishi FTO Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lexus SC

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

68.5–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

LexusMakeMitsubishi
SCModelFTO
2000Model year1999
CoupeBody typeCoupe
2+2Seats2
2Doors2

Performance

7,5 s0–100 km/h—
235 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2997 ccEngine displacement2972 cc
228 HPPower225 HP
298 NmTorque275 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
78 ltFuel tank75 lt
12,8 ltUrban consumption—
9,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
225/55 R16Tyre size225/50 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4850 mmLength4590 mm
1790 mmWidth1840 mm
1340 mmHeight1285 mm
1610 KgWeight1670 Kg
2690 mmWheelbase2470 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Lexus SC and 1999 Mitsubishi FTO approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lexus SC leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…