DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Mitsubishi FTO vs 2000 Lexus SC Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lexus SC

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

67.5–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeLexus
FTOModelSC
1999Model year2000
CoupeBody typeCoupe
2Seats2+2
2Doors2

Performance

—0–100 km/h7,5 s
0 km/hTop speed235 km/h
2972 ccEngine displacement2997 cc
225 HPPower228 HP
275 NmTorque298 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank78 lt
—Urban consumption12,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
225/50 R17Tyre size225/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4590 mmLength4850 mm
1840 mmWidth1790 mm
1285 mmHeight1340 mm
1670 KgWeight1610 Kg
2470 mmWheelbase2690 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Mitsubishi FTO and 2000 Lexus SC approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lexus SC leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…