DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Lexus RX vs 2004 Land Rover Range Rover Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lexus RX

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

68.5–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

LexusMakeLand Rover
RXModelRange Rover
2004Model year2004
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,0 s0–100 km/h13,6 s
200 km/hTop speed179 km/h
2995 ccEngine displacement2926 cc
204 HPPower177 HP
283 NmTorque390 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
72 ltFuel tank100 lt
16,9 ltUrban consumption14,4 lt
9,4 ltExtra-urban consumption9,4 lt
12,2 ltAverage consumption11,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
225/60 R17Tyre size255/55 R19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4740 mmLength4950 mm
1845 mmWidth1955 mm
1705 mmHeight1860 mm
1835 KgWeight2500 Kg
2715 mmWheelbase2880 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Lexus RX and 2004 Land Rover Range Rover approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lexus RX leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…