DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Land Rover Range Rover vs 2004 Lexus RX Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lexus RX

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

67.5–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeLexus
Range RoverModelRX
2004Model year2004
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

13,6 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
179 km/hTop speed200 km/h
2926 ccEngine displacement2995 cc
177 HPPower204 HP
390 NmTorque283 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
100 ltFuel tank72 lt
14,4 ltUrban consumption16,9 lt
9,4 ltExtra-urban consumption9,4 lt
11,3 ltAverage consumption12,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
255/55 R19Tyre size225/60 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4950 mmLength4740 mm
1955 mmWidth1845 mm
1860 mmHeight1705 mm
2500 KgWeight1835 Kg
2880 mmWheelbase2715 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Land Rover Range Rover and 2004 Lexus RX approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lexus RX leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…