DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Lexus LS vs 2012 Land Rover Range Rover Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lexus LS

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

87.75–86.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

LexusMakeLand Rover
LSModelRange Rover
2012Model year2012
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h6,8 s
210 km/hTop speed209 km/h
4608 ccEngine displacement5000 cc
367 HPPower375 HP
466 NmTorque510 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
84 ltFuel tank105 lt
14,7 ltUrban consumption18,0 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9,5 lt
10,2 ltAverage consumption12,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
8Gears8
235/50 R18; 245/45 R19Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5060 mmLength4999 mm
1875 mmWidth1983 mm
1465 mmHeight1835 mm
2145 KgWeight2200 Kg
2970 mmWheelbase2922 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Lexus LS and 2012 Land Rover Range Rover approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lexus LS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…