DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Land Rover Range Rover vs 2012 Lexus LS Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lexus LS

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

86.75–87.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeLexus
Range RoverModelLS
2012Model year2012
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

7,6 s0–100 km/h—
210 km/hTop speed210 km/h
4999 ccEngine displacement4608 cc
375 HPPower367 HP
510 NmTorque466 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
101 ltFuel tank84 lt
20,8 ltUrban consumption14,7 lt
10,0 ltExtra-urban consumption—
14,0 ltAverage consumption10,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears8
—Tyre size235/50 R18; 245/45 R19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4972 mmLength5060 mm
—Width1875 mm
1865 mmHeight1465 mm
—Weight2145 Kg
2880 mmWheelbase2970 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Land Rover Range Rover and 2012 Lexus LS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lexus LS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…