DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Lexus LS vs 2003 Lincoln LS Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lexus LS

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

82.5–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Lexus LSSpecificationLincoln LS
LexusMakeLincoln
LSModelLS
2002Model year2003
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Lexus LSSpecificationLincoln LS
6,7 s0–100 km/h—
250 km/hTop speed230 km/h
4293 ccEngine displacement3950 cc
282 HPPower284 HP
417 NmTorque388 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

Lexus LSSpecificationLincoln LS
PetrolFuel typePetrol
84 ltFuel tank68 lt
17,5 ltUrban consumption16 lt
8,9 ltExtra-urban consumption9 lt
12 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Lexus LSSpecificationLincoln LS
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
225/55 R17Tyre size235/50 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Lexus LSSpecificationLincoln LS
5005 mmLength4925 mm
1830 mmWidth1860 mm
1470 mmHeight1450 mm
1830 KgWeight1710 Kg
2925 mmWheelbase2910 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Lexus LS and 2003 Lincoln LS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lexus LS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…