DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Lexus LS vs 2000 Toyota Celsior Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lexus LS

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

79.5–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

LexusMakeToyota
LSModelCelsior
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

7,1 s0–100 km/h—
250 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3969 ccEngine displacement3968 cc
276 HPPower280 HP
387 NmTorque402 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
85 ltFuel tank85 lt
16,8 ltUrban consumption—
9,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
11,9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
225/60 R16Tyre size225/60 R16 98H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4995 mmLength4995 mm
1830 mmWidth1830 mm
1435 mmHeight1435 mm
1815 KgWeight1640 Kg
2850 mmWheelbase2850 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Lexus LS and 2000 Toyota Celsior approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lexus LS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…