DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Jaguar XJ vs 2000 Lexus LS Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jaguar XJ

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

79.75–79.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Jaguar XJSpecificationLexus LS
JaguarMakeLexus
XJModelLS
1999Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Jaguar XJSpecificationLexus LS
7,3 s0–100 km/h7,1 s
240 km/hTop speed250 km/h
3996 ccEngine displacement3969 cc
284 HPPower276 HP
375 NmTorque387 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

Jaguar XJSpecificationLexus LS
PetrolFuel typePetrol
81 ltFuel tank85 lt
17,2 ltUrban consumption16,8 lt
8,9 ltExtra-urban consumption9,1 lt
12 ltAverage consumption11,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Jaguar XJSpecificationLexus LS
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/50 R17Tyre size225/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Jaguar XJSpecificationLexus LS
5023 mmLength4995 mm
1799 mmWidth1830 mm
1345 mmHeight1435 mm
1780 KgWeight1815 Kg
2870 mmWheelbase2850 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Jaguar XJ and 2000 Lexus LS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jaguar XJ leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…