DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Lexus ES vs 1997 Lexus RX Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lexus RX

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Lexus ESSpecificationLexus RX
LexusMakeLexus
ESModelRX
1996Model year1997
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Lexus ESSpecificationLexus RX
—0–100 km/h9,2 s
0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
2994 ccEngine displacement2995 cc
188 HPPower201 HP
275 NmTorque283 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Lexus ESSpecificationLexus RX
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank75 lt
—Urban consumption17,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption10,3 lt
11,6 ltAverage consumption13 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Lexus ESSpecificationLexus RX
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
205/65 R15Tyre size225/60 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Lexus ESSpecificationLexus RX
4770 mmLength4580 mm
1778 mmWidth1815 mm
1370 mmHeight1660 mm
1530 KgWeight1800 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2615 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Lexus ES and 1997 Lexus RX approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lexus RX leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…