DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1997 Lexus RX vs 1996 Lexus ES Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lexus RX

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.25–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Lexus RXSpecificationLexus ES
LexusMakeLexus
RXModelES
1997Model year1996
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Lexus RXSpecificationLexus ES
9,2 s0–100 km/h—
180 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2995 ccEngine displacement2994 cc
201 HPPower188 HP
283 NmTorque275 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Lexus RXSpecificationLexus ES
PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank70 lt
17,7 ltUrban consumption—
10,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
13 ltAverage consumption11,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Lexus RXSpecificationLexus ES
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
225/60 R17Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Lexus RXSpecificationLexus ES
4580 mmLength4770 mm
1815 mmWidth1778 mm
1660 mmHeight1370 mm
1800 KgWeight1530 Kg
2615 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1997 Lexus RX and 1996 Lexus ES approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lexus RX leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…