DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1992 Lexus ES vs 1992 Ford Aerostar Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Aerostar

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

LexusMakeFord
ESModelAerostar
1992Model year1992
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed160 km/h
2994 ccEngine displacement2979 cc
188 HPPower147 HP
275 NmTorque224 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank79 lt
—Urban consumption16 lt
—Extra-urban consumption11 lt
11,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size205/75 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4770 mmLength4440 mm
1778 mmWidth1820 mm
1370 mmHeight1850 mm
1530 KgWeight1530 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase3020 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1992 Lexus ES and 1992 Ford Aerostar approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Aerostar leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…