1992 • Ford
Aerostar
Ford Aerostar 3.0i V6 (147 Hp) 1992Overall Score65.25/100
1992 Ford Aerostar vs 1992 Lexus ES Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1992 • Lexus
ES
Lexus ES 1992Overall Score64.5/100
WINNER
Ford Aerostar
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
65.25–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford AerostarSpecificationLexus ES
FordMakeLexus
AerostarModelES
1992Model year1992
MinivanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Ford AerostarSpecificationLexus ES
160 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2979 ccEngine displacement2994 cc
147 HPPower188 HP
224 NmTorque275 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Ford AerostarSpecificationLexus ES
PetrolFuel typePetrol
79 ltFuel tank70 lt
16 ltUrban consumption—
11 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption11,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford AerostarSpecificationLexus ES
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
205/75 R14Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford AerostarSpecificationLexus ES
4440 mmLength4770 mm
1820 mmWidth1778 mm
1850 mmHeight1370 mm
1530 KgWeight1530 Kg
3020 mmWheelbase2620 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1992 Ford Aerostar and 1992 Lexus ES approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Aerostar leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…