DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2008 Landwind SUV vs 2008 Mazda BT-50 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda BT-50

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

61.5–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

LandwindMakeMazda
SUVModelBT-50
2008Model year2008
SUVBody typePick-up
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h12,5 s
140 km/hTop speed158 km/h
2800 ccEngine displacement2500 cc
92 HPPower143 HP
205 NmTorque330 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
63 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption11,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,0 lt
—Average consumption9,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
245/75 R16Tyre size235/75 R15; 245/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4800 mmLength5075 mm
1800 mmWidth1805 mm
1750 mmHeight1750 mm
1935 KgWeight1940 Kg
2760 mmWheelbase3000 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2008 Landwind SUV and 2008 Mazda BT-50 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda BT-50 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…