DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Land Rover Range Rover vs 2000 Lincoln Town Car Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lincoln Town Car

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

73.5–74.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeLincoln
Range RoverModelTown Car
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

9,9 s0–100 km/h—
196 km/hTop speed180 km/h
4553 ccEngine displacement4601 cc
224 HPPower223 HP
380 NmTorque360 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
100 ltFuel tank72 lt
22,9 ltUrban consumption13,8 lt
16,4 ltExtra-urban consumption9,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
255/65 R16Tyre size225/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4713 mmLength5470 mm
1853 mmWidth1985 mm
1817 mmHeight1470 mm
2220 KgWeight1950 Kg
2745 mmWheelbase2990 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Land Rover Range Rover and 2000 Lincoln Town Car approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lincoln Town Car leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…