DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Ford Crown Victoria vs 2000 Land Rover Range Rover Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Crown Victoria

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

74.5–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeLand Rover
Crown VictoriaModelRange Rover
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
6Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,9 s
177 km/hTop speed196 km/h
4601 ccEngine displacement4553 cc
223 HPPower224 HP
359 NmTorque380 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank100 lt
13,8 ltUrban consumption22,9 lt
9,4 ltExtra-urban consumption16,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears4
225/60 R16Tyre size255/65 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5385 mmLength4713 mm
1986 mmWidth1853 mm
1443 mmHeight1817 mm
1830 KgWeight2220 Kg
2913 mmWheelbase2745 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Ford Crown Victoria and 2000 Land Rover Range Rover approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Crown Victoria leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…