DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Land Rover Range Rover vs 2000 Ford Crown Victoria Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Crown Victoria

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

73.5–74.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeFord
Range RoverModelCrown Victoria
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats6
5Doors4

Performance

9,9 s0–100 km/h—
196 km/hTop speed177 km/h
4553 ccEngine displacement4601 cc
224 HPPower223 HP
380 NmTorque359 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
100 ltFuel tank72 lt
22,9 ltUrban consumption13,8 lt
16,4 ltExtra-urban consumption9,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
255/65 R16Tyre size225/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4713 mmLength5385 mm
1853 mmWidth1986 mm
1817 mmHeight1443 mm
2220 KgWeight1830 Kg
2745 mmWheelbase2913 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Land Rover Range Rover and 2000 Ford Crown Victoria approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Crown Victoria leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…