DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Land Rover Range Rover vs 2000 BMW X5 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

BMW X5

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 5 points.

78.75–83.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeBMW
Range RoverModelX5
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,9 s0–100 km/h6,5 s
200 km/hTop speed240 km/h
4552 ccEngine displacement4619 cc
218 HPPower347 HP
400 NmTorque480 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
100 ltFuel tank93 lt
23,9 ltUrban consumption21,0 lt
12,2 ltExtra-urban consumption11,4 lt
—Average consumption14,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
4Gears5
255/65R16Tyre size275/40 R20; 315/35 R20
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4713 mmLength4666 mm
1853 mmWidth1872 mm
1817 mmHeight1717 mm
2120 KgWeight2105 Kg
2745 mmWheelbase2820 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Land Rover Range Rover and 2000 BMW X5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, BMW X5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…