DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 GMC Yukon vs 2000 Land Rover Range Rover Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

GMC Yukon

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

79.5–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GMCMakeLand Rover
YukonModelRange Rover
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,9 s
156 km/hTop speed200 km/h
4807 ccEngine displacement4552 cc
278 HPPower218 HP
393 NmTorque400 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
98 ltFuel tank100 lt
16,8 ltUrban consumption23,9 lt
13,1 ltExtra-urban consumption12,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
4Gears4
245/75 R16Tyre size255/65R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5029 mmLength4713 mm
2004 mmWidth1853 mm
1943 mmHeight1817 mm
2350 KgWeight2120 Kg
2946 mmWheelbase2745 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 GMC Yukon and 2000 Land Rover Range Rover approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, GMC Yukon leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…