DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Land Rover Range Rover vs 2000 GMC Yukon Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

GMC Yukon

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

78.75–79.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeGMC
Range RoverModelYukon
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,9 s0–100 km/h—
200 km/hTop speed156 km/h
4552 ccEngine displacement4807 cc
218 HPPower278 HP
400 NmTorque393 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
100 ltFuel tank98 lt
23,9 ltUrban consumption16,8 lt
12,2 ltExtra-urban consumption13,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
4Gears4
255/65R16Tyre size245/75 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4713 mmLength5029 mm
1853 mmWidth2004 mm
1817 mmHeight1943 mm
2120 KgWeight2350 Kg
2745 mmWheelbase2946 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Land Rover Range Rover and 2000 GMC Yukon approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, GMC Yukon leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…