2000 • Dodge
Dakota
Dodge Dakota 4.7 V8 (238 Hp) 2000Overall Score78.75/100
2000 Dodge Dakota vs 1999 Land Rover Range Rover Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1999 • Land Rover
Range Rover
Land Rover Range Rover Range 4.6 (218 Hp) 1999Overall Score77.75/100
WINNER
Dodge Dakota
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
78.75–77.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Dodge DakotaSpecificationLand Rover Range Rover
DodgeMakeLand Rover
DakotaModelRange Rover
2000Model year1999
Pick-upBody typeOff-road vehicle
6Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Dodge DakotaSpecificationLand Rover Range Rover
—0–100 km/h9,9 s
0 km/hTop speed200 km/h
4701 ccEngine displacement4552 cc
238 HPPower218 HP
400 NmTorque400 Nm
8Cylinders8
Fuel & Consumption
Dodge DakotaSpecificationLand Rover Range Rover
PetrolFuel typePetrol
91 ltFuel tank100 lt
—Urban consumption23,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption12,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Dodge DakotaSpecificationLand Rover Range Rover
5463 mmLength4713 mm
1818 mmWidth1853 mm
1699 mmHeight1817 mm
—Weight2120 Kg
3227 mmWheelbase2745 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Dodge Dakota and 1999 Land Rover Range Rover approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Dodge Dakota leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSDodge Dakota vs Dodge Dakota1999 and 2000 model years
VSChevrolet Tahoe vs Dodge Dakota2000 and 2000 model yearsImage unavailableVSGMC Yukon vs Dodge Dakota2000 and 2000 model yearsVSLand Rover Range Rover vs Dodge Dakota1999 and 2000 model yearsImage unavailableVSHolden UTE vs Dodge Dakota1999 and 2000 model yearsComments are loading…