DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Land Rover Range Rover vs 2002 Dodge RAM Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Dodge RAM

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

77.75–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeDodge
Range RoverModelRAM
1999Model year2002
Off-road vehicleBody typePick-up
5Seats6
5Doors4

Performance

9,9 s0–100 km/h—
200 km/hTop speed0 km/h
4552 ccEngine displacement4701 cc
218 HPPower238 HP
400 NmTorque400 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
100 ltFuel tank0 lt
23,9 ltUrban consumption—
12,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears6
255/65R16Tyre size265/70 R17; 245/70 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4713 mmLength5834 mm
1853 mmWidth2019 mm
1817 mmHeight1880 mm
2120 KgWeight—
2745 mmWheelbase3569 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Land Rover Range Rover and 2002 Dodge RAM approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Dodge RAM leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…