DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 Land Rover Range Rover vs 2000 Land Rover Range Rover Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Land Rover Range Rover

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

77.75–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeLand Rover
Range RoverModelRange Rover
1998Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,9 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
200 km/hTop speed200 km/h
4552 ccEngine displacement4552 cc
218 HPPower218 HP
400 NmTorque400 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
100 ltFuel tank100 lt
23,9 ltUrban consumption23,9 lt
12,2 ltExtra-urban consumption12,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
4Gears4
255/65R16Tyre size255/65R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4713 mmLength4713 mm
1853 mmWidth1853 mm
1817 mmHeight1817 mm
2120 KgWeight2120 Kg
2745 mmWheelbase2745 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 Land Rover Range Rover and 2000 Land Rover Range Rover approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Land Rover Range Rover leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…