DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 Land Rover Range Rover vs 2000 Dodge Dakota Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Dodge Dakota

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

77.75–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeDodge
Range RoverModelDakota
1998Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typePick-up
5Seats6
5Doors4

Performance

9,9 s0–100 km/h—
200 km/hTop speed0 km/h
4552 ccEngine displacement4701 cc
218 HPPower238 HP
400 NmTorque400 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
100 ltFuel tank91 lt
23,9 ltUrban consumption—
12,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
4Gears5
255/65R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4713 mmLength5463 mm
1853 mmWidth1818 mm
1817 mmHeight1699 mm
2120 KgWeight—
2745 mmWheelbase3227 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 Land Rover Range Rover and 2000 Dodge Dakota approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Dodge Dakota leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…