DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Land Rover Range Rover vs 2017 Bristol Bullet Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Bristol Bullet

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

88.75–89.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeBristol
Range RoverModelBullet
2016Model year2017
SUVBody typeRoadster
5Seats2
5Doors2

Performance

6,9 s0–100 km/h3,8 s
217 km/hTop speed249 km/h
4367 ccEngine displacement4799 cc
339 HPPower374 HP
600 NmTorque502 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
105 ltFuel tank55 lt
11,5 ltUrban consumption—
7,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,7 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
8Gears6
—Tyre size225/35 R19; 245/35 R19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4999 mmLength4200 mm
1983 mmWidth1860 mm
1835 mmHeight1200 mm
2360 KgWeight1100 Kg
2922 mmWheelbase2553 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Land Rover Range Rover and 2017 Bristol Bullet approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Bristol Bullet leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…