DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Bristol Bullet vs 2016 Land Rover Range Rover Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Bristol Bullet

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

89.75–88.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BristolMakeLand Rover
BulletModelRange Rover
2017Model year2016
RoadsterBody typeSUV
2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

3,8 s0–100 km/h6,9 s
249 km/hTop speed217 km/h
4799 ccEngine displacement4367 cc
374 HPPower339 HP
502 NmTorque600 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank105 lt
—Urban consumption11,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,6 lt
—Average consumption8,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears8
225/35 R19; 245/35 R19Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4200 mmLength4999 mm
1860 mmWidth1983 mm
1200 mmHeight1835 mm
1100 KgWeight2360 Kg
2553 mmWheelbase2922 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Bristol Bullet and 2016 Land Rover Range Rover approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Bristol Bullet leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…