DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Land Rover Range Rover vs 2004 Jaguar XJ Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jaguar XJ

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

86.75–87.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeJaguar
Range RoverModelXJ
2005Model year2004
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

9,2 s0–100 km/h6,6 s
208 km/hTop speed250 km/h
4398 ccEngine displacement4196 cc
286 HPPower298 HP
440 NmTorque411 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
100 ltFuel tank85 lt
22,2 ltUrban consumption16 lt
12,6 ltExtra-urban consumption8,1 lt
16,2 ltAverage consumption10,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears6
255/60 R18Tyre size235/50 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4950 mmLength5215 mm
1955 mmWidth1860 mm
1860 mmHeight1448 mm
2510 KgWeight1640 Kg
2880 mmWheelbase3159 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Land Rover Range Rover and 2004 Jaguar XJ approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jaguar XJ leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…