DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Jaguar XJ vs 2005 Land Rover Range Rover Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jaguar XJ

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

87.5–86.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JaguarMakeLand Rover
XJModelRange Rover
2004Model year2005
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

6,6 s0–100 km/h9,2 s
250 km/hTop speed208 km/h
4196 ccEngine displacement4398 cc
298 HPPower286 HP
411 NmTorque440 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
85 ltFuel tank100 lt
16 ltUrban consumption22,2 lt
8,1 ltExtra-urban consumption12,6 lt
10,9 ltAverage consumption16,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears5
235/50 R18Tyre size255/60 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5215 mmLength4950 mm
1860 mmWidth1955 mm
1448 mmHeight1860 mm
1640 KgWeight2510 Kg
3159 mmWheelbase2880 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Jaguar XJ and 2005 Land Rover Range Rover approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jaguar XJ leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…