DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Land Rover Range Rover vs 2010 Nissan Cima Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Cima

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

86.75–87.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeNissan
Range RoverModelCima
2012Model year2010
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

7,8 s0–100 km/h—
210 km/hTop speed230 km/h
4367 ccEngine displacement4494 cc
313 HPPower280 HP
700 NmTorque451 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
101 ltFuel tank80 lt
11,5 ltUrban consumption—
8,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,4 ltAverage consumption10 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
8Gears4
—Tyre size225/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4972 mmLength4970 mm
—Width1820 mm
1865 mmHeight1450 mm
—Weight1770 Kg
2880 mmWheelbase2830 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Land Rover Range Rover and 2010 Nissan Cima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Cima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…