DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Ford Mustang vs 2012 Land Rover Range Rover Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Mustang

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

87.75–86.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeLand Rover
MustangModelRange Rover
2012Model year2012
CoupeBody typeSUV
4Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h7,8 s
240 km/hTop speed210 km/h
4606 ccEngine displacement4367 cc
304 HPPower313 HP
427 NmTorque700 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
61 ltFuel tank101 lt
17 ltUrban consumption11,5 lt
13,6 ltExtra-urban consumption8,2 lt
15,5 ltAverage consumption9,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears8
235/55 R17Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4765 mmLength4972 mm
1875 mmWidth—
1385 mmHeight1865 mm
1565 KgWeight—
2720 mmWheelbase2880 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Ford Mustang and 2012 Land Rover Range Rover approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Mustang leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…