DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Ford Mustang vs 2005 Land Rover Range Rover Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Mustang

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

87.75–86.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeLand Rover
MustangModelRange Rover
2005Model year2005
CoupeBody typeOff-road vehicle
4Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,2 s
240 km/hTop speed208 km/h
4606 ccEngine displacement4394 cc
304 HPPower299 HP
427 NmTorque425 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
61 ltFuel tank105 lt
17 ltUrban consumption21,2 lt
13,6 ltExtra-urban consumption11,4 lt
15,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears6
235/55 R17Tyre size225/60 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4765 mmLength4950 mm
1875 mmWidth1955 mm
1385 mmHeight1860 mm
1565 KgWeight2485 Kg
2720 mmWheelbase2880 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Ford Mustang and 2005 Land Rover Range Rover approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Mustang leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…