DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2001 Ford Explorer vs 2001 Land Rover Range Rover Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Explorer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

65.5–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeLand Rover
ExplorerModelRange Rover
2001Model year2001
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

10,9 s0–100 km/h—
171 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3996 ccEngine displacement3900 cc
208 HPPower190 HP
339 NmTorque0 Nm
6Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
83 ltFuel tank0 lt
18,2 ltUrban consumption—
11,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain—
5Gears—
255/70 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4530 mmLength—
1790 mmWidth—
1800 mmHeight—
1670 KgWeight—
2595 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2001 Ford Explorer and 2001 Land Rover Range Rover approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Explorer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…