DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2001 Land Rover Range Rover vs 2002 Jeep Cherokee Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jeep Cherokee

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

64.5–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeJeep
Range RoverModelCherokee
2001Model year2002
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,8 s
0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
3900 ccEngine displacement3700 cc
190 HPPower210 HP
0 NmTorque307 Nm
8Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank76 lt
—Urban consumption18,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption10,3 lt
—Average consumption13 lt

Transmission & Chassis

—Drivetrain4x4
—Gears5
—Tyre size235/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

—Length4430 mm
—Width1820 mm
—Height1865 mm
—Weight1770 Kg
—Wheelbase2650 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2001 Land Rover Range Rover and 2002 Jeep Cherokee approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jeep Cherokee leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…