DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Land Rover Range Rover vs 1995 Holden Commodore Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Holden Commodore

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

63.5–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeHolden
Range RoverModelCommodore
1995Model year1995
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,2 s
0 km/hTop speed195 km/h
3900 ccEngine displacement3813 cc
190 HPPower177 HP
0 NmTorque320 Nm
8Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank63 lt
—Average consumption11,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

—DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
—Gears5
—Tyre size205/65 R15 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

—Length4861 mm
—Width1794 mm
—Height1448 mm
—Weight1370 Kg
—Wheelbase2731 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Land Rover Range Rover and 1995 Holden Commodore approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Holden Commodore leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…