DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Holden Commodore vs 1995 Land Rover Range Rover Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Holden Commodore

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

64.5–63.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeLand Rover
CommodoreModelRange Rover
1995Model year1995
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

9,2 s0–100 km/h—
195 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3813 ccEngine displacement3900 cc
177 HPPower190 HP
320 NmTorque0 Nm
6Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
63 ltFuel tank0 lt
11,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain—
5Gears—
205/65 R15 HTyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4861 mmLength—
1794 mmWidth—
1448 mmHeight—
1370 KgWeight—
2731 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Holden Commodore and 1995 Land Rover Range Rover approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Holden Commodore leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…